Case Study

A signed SHA. Six hours to a frozen account. Twelve months to a Series B pipeline.

Deep-technology companies are usually built in the wrong order for their balance sheets. The product matures first, the customer base second, and the finance function whenever someone gets to it. In the interval, R&D absorbs cash faster than collections replace it, and statutory calendars do not adjust for that. This is the record of one such mandate: what the company looked like when the seat was taken, the order in which the work was done, and where it stands now.

Client
A bootstrapped, founder-led Indian technology company in the energy sector. Software deployed inside large industrial assets. Two years old at the start of the mandate.
Mandate
Finance, end to end, from inside the company. Cash, capital, debt, compliance, reporting, structure, and the finance function itself.
Duration
Twelve months to the position described. Ongoing.
Disclosure
Every figure is a multiple, a count, or a rounded range. Counterparties are described by type, not named. Published with the client's consent.
What an Embedded CFO engagement is. A CFO who sits inside the company, owns the number, and is answerable for it to the founder, the board, the lender and the investor. Not a monthly review. Not a retainer that reads what the accounts team produced. The seat itself, held by someone who has held it before, until the company can recruit for it permanently. Scope of the engagement →
Sound familiar?
“The GST is due on Friday. The receivable that covers it clears next month.”
“The bank has given us until close of business on the TDS. The SHA was signed yesterday.”
“A large group has offered a valuation. We know it is low. We are not sure we can afford to say so.”
“Our working capital limit is smaller than one customer invoice.”
“We pay suppliers in advance and collect from customers in ninety days.”
“Tally, the project tracker and the auditor each have a different number for the same project.”

Each of these was true inside this company at some point in the first six months. None of them describes a weak business. They describe a strong business whose financial infrastructure had not kept pace with its product.

6 hrs
Between the bank's notice of freeze for a GST arrear and close of business, with the Series A SHA executed and the CCPS not yet allotted.
~6×
Series A valuation against the strategic offer the founder had declined six months earlier. Same company, tighter cash, different audience.
~33×
Growth in sanctioned working capital over sixteen months, single-digit lakhs to mid-teens crores, with maximum CGTMSE cover at every enhancement.
15+
Institutional funds in active Series B conversations at the twelve-month mark, at roughly thirty times the declined offer.
0
Qualifications in the statutory audit report for the mandate year. The preceding year carried open items across GST, TDS and Companies Act filings.

The product was ahead. The infrastructure was not.

The company had built a category of software that no domestic competitor matched in depth, and had paying customers among the largest operators in its sector. It had done this on founder capital and customer advances alone. Revenue arrived in a small number of large, lumpy contracts; cost left every month as salaries and engineering spend. The gap between those two curves had been absorbed for two years by deferring what could be deferred.

By the start of the mandate, that approach had reached the end of its useful life.

Figure A · Why the gap existed
Cumulative outflowsCumulative receiptsFinanced by deferralMonth 0Month 24 →PO 1PO 2PO 3
Illustrative shape, not the company's figures. Salaries and engineering spend accrue monthly; receipts arrive per purchase order. Every point where the blue line sits below the black one was funded by deferring something.
Figure 1 · Position at the start of the mandate
ItemState
GSTRiskArrears with interest accruing; input credit never reconciled to GSTR-2B
TDSRiskSeveral quarters outstanding; Form 26AS not reconciled to the ledger
PayrollRiskSalaries deferred in two consecutive months, without a published schedule
SuppliersFindingAdvance payment terms by contract; overdue in practice
CustomersFinding45 to 90 day open credit; no collections ownership
Bank limitsFindingOne cash credit line, smaller than a single large invoice
CapitalFindingA declined offer from a large conglomerate's strategic arm; no live process
BooksFindingTally, single entity, no project-level costing or margin
GovernanceFindingMCA filings behind; no AOP, budget or MIS

Every row was a consequence of growth outrunning process, not of poor judgement. The question was not whether the business was sound. It was whether anyone could yet prove that it was, to a bank, an investor or an auditor, on paper.

Our positionA company that is about to break out and a company that is about to run out present identical statutory calendars. The difference is whether the cash is owned by someone whose only job is to own it.

Stabilise. Reposition. Close. Institutionalise. Leverage. Extend.

Six phases, overlapping at the edges but strictly ordered in their dependencies. Capital was not raised until cash was controlled. The function was not rebuilt until capital was in. Debt was not scaled until the audited numbers could carry it.

IMonths 0 to 3

Stabilise the cash

The first quarter ran off a single daily cash statement: every expected receipt, every committed payment, every statutory date, reviewed each morning with the founder before any other decision was taken.

Statutory obligations were ranked first. GST and TDS arrears are the only liabilities that can freeze an operating account, attach personally to directors of a private company, and remain visible in every future diligence. They moved to the top of the payment order and stayed there.

Supplier payments were re-sequenced deliberately, not allowed to slip. Suppliers were classified by consequence: those whose supply gated a live project, those holding company data, those with a direct relationship to the founder, and the remainder. Each revised date was communicated by finance, in writing, and each was met. The renegotiation of terms that followed a year later was possible only because those commitments had held.

Figure B · The payment order, as applied
1StatutoryGST, TDS, PF, ESI. Freezes accounts; attaches to directors.2Payroll, junior firstPublished schedule; senior deferral with a recovery date.3Project-gating suppliersNon-delivery stops a live customer project.4Data and platform suppliersCloud, licences, connectivity.5Founder-relationship suppliersFounder decides; finance communicates.6RemainderRe-dated in writing; every revised date met.
Bar length is rank, not amount. The order was fixed in the first week and did not change for the duration of the stabilisation phase.

Payroll was placed on a published schedule. Junior staff were paid in full and first. Senior staff accepted a defined deferral with a defined recovery date. The company retained its entire engineering team through the period.

Our positionA deferred payment that has been announced is a working-capital event. One that has not been announced is a credibility event. Only the first is recoverable at the original price.
IIMonths 2 to 5

Reposition the raise

Six months before the mandate, a large conglomerate's strategic arm had offered a low-single-digit-million-dollar valuation. The founder had declined it. By the start of the mandate there was no live process and the cash position was tighter than when the offer was made.

The company had not changed. Its audience and its evidence had to.

The audience. A strategic investor values a technology company against its own cost to replicate the technology. A family office that already operates the kind of assets the software manages values it against what the software does to those assets. The same product, presented to sector family offices, was understood in the first meeting rather than the fourth.

The evidence. The financial model was rebuilt from the order book upward. Every open opportunity in the CRM was reclassified by product line, complexity and installed capacity. Two years of purchase orders were used to derive the pricing that customers had actually paid, and the forward revenue line was built on that, not on list prices. The data room was assembled before the first meeting: every compliance gap listed, dated, and shown with remediation already under way; every figure in the deck traceable to the ledger.

Figure C · Same company, three audiences
Strategic arm, declined1×months −6 to 0Sector family offices, Series A~6×month 6 · cash tighter than at 1×Institutional funds, Series B~30×Series B bar truncated. Figure is where conversations sit, not a closed price.

The Series A was agreed at roughly six times the declined valuation, with a weaker cash position at signing than at the time of the first offer.

Our positionA company does not carry one valuation. It carries one per audience. Selecting the audience is the founder's decision. Making the number withstand that audience is the CFO's.
IIIMonths 5 to 7

Close the round, and hold the line while it closes

The shareholders' agreement was executed. Between execution and the allotment of the CCPS sit the conditions precedent, the valuation report, board and shareholder approvals, and the investors' own drawdown mechanics. In this case, several weeks. The company's cash did not have several weeks.

Figure D · Between signature and allotment
Term sheetSHA executedBank notice · 6 hrsGST arrear cleared same dayCN drawnCPs satisfiedCCPS allottedPAS-3 · FC-GPRCash from the roundnone · several weeksconvertible note funds the companypriced equityWeeks, not to scale. The note converted into the same CCPS series at allotment.

The six hours. With the SHA signed and the allotment pending, the bank served notice that the operating account would be frozen at close of business for a GST arrear. The arrear was cleared within the day. The episode is recorded here not for drama but because it fixed the design of the bridge that followed: the round had to fund the company before it had technically closed.

The bridge was a convertible note, and it was lawful only because the company held DPIIT recognition. Under Rule 2(1)(c) of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014, an amount received from an individual is a deposit unless a listed exception applies. Clause (xvii) exists solely for recognised startups: a convertible note of not less than ₹25 lakh from a single person, received in one tranche, convertible into equity or repayable within ten years. Absent recognition, the identical instrument is an unlawful deposit from the day it is received. With it, individual investors in the round funded the company inside a week while the priced instrument was papered.

Figure E · Rule 2(1)(c)(xvii), as a gate
DPIIT recognisedon the day received→≥ ₹25 lakhper individual→Single trancheno instalments→≤ 10 yearsconvert or repayAll four hold · not a depositAny one fails · a depositCompanies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014. All four verified in writing before funds moved.

The priced round was then closed in full. Compulsorily convertible preference shares for the institutional and family office investors, with conversion, anti-dilution and liquidation preference drafted to Indian law rather than adapted from a Delaware precedent. SSHA and SHA settled with counsel. Every condition precedent tracked on one sheet with an owner and a date. Registered valuer's report. PAS-3, FC-GPR and the company secretary's certification filed in sequence so that the FEMA record was complete before any investor asked for it. All shares dematerialised under Rule 9B of the PAS Rules ahead of allotment, so the register lived in a depository rather than a ledger.

Our positionThe instrument that can fund the company this week is preferable to the instrument it should have this quarter, provided the specific rule that makes the faster instrument lawful has been read, and applies.
IVMonths 7 to 12

Institutionalise the function

With capital in the account, the work moved from preservation to construction.

Planning.An annual operating plan and departmental budgets for the first time in the company's history, monthly, with each function head accountable for their own lines. The numbers committed to investors for the fundraise year were delivered. The following year's AOP was built bottom-up from pipeline, headcount and the R&D roadmap, and approved by the board.

People. The finance team was restructured around measurable ownership: collections, payables ageing, month-close date, reconciliation status. Accountability extended outward. Business development owns the credit terms it signs. Operations owns project cost against budget. Both report into a monthly review.

Systems. Migration from Tally to Zoho, with CRM, inventory and project modules integrated. Project-level cost of goods sold and margin, live, for the first time. Purchase order, dispatch and invoice on one chain.

Figure F · One chain of record
Before · three recordsTallyProject trackerAuditor's schedulethree marginsAfter · one chain, ZohoPurchase order→Dispatch→Invoice→Collectionone marginCRM, inventory, projects and books share the record. Project margin is visible before the project closes.

Compliance. TDS reconciled to Form 26AS across every deductor, to a nil difference. Twelve months of input credit reconciled to GSTR-2B. Board meetings, the annual general meeting and every MCA filing brought current. The statutory audit report for the year was unqualified. Recognition under Section 80-IAC was obtained from the Inter-Ministerial Board with full documentation of the innovation and eligibility conditions, securing the three-year tax holiday.

Reporting. Monthly investor reporting began the month after allotment and has not missed a cycle.

Our positionInvestors do not fund a model. They fund the team that produces the same model every month without being asked to.
VMonths 8 to 16

Leverage the balance sheet

The fund-based limit at the start of the mandate was a single-digit-lakh cash credit line. Sixteen months later the sanctioned fund-based facility stood in the mid-teens of crores, with a further ₹10 crore non-fund-based limit for bank guarantees and letters of credit, for a company with two years of operating history.

Each enhancement was a separate proposal, a separate CMA data pack, and a separate negotiation, and each carried the maximum guarantee cover available under CGTMSE so that promoter exposure remained at the statutory floor.

Figure G · The debt ladder, sixteen months
10×20×30×1× · cash credit~4×~11×~33×non-fund limit, BG and LC · ~22×CGTMSE cover at maximum eligible level throughoutMonth 081116
Multiples of the starting fund-based limit. Each step was a separate CMA pack and sanction. Two bankers from month 13; the second carries LC discounting and the cash-collateralised non-fund line.

The banking architecture was redesigned.The primary banker could not discount letters of credit issued by certain public sector banks and had been slow to issue performance guarantees to overseas customers. It was retained on renegotiated terms while a second banker was onboarded for LC discounting and a cash-collateralised non-fund line. The two-bank structure anticipates the turnover threshold at which CGTMSE cover ceases and the facilities reprice against the promoter's balance sheet.

Working capital was corrected at both ends. Procurement moved from advance payment to 45-day credit with major suppliers. Business development moved customer terms from 45 to 60 day open credit to letters of credit at dispatch. The cash conversion cycle shortened from both directions without additional borrowing.

Figure H · Cash cycle, before and after
Dispatch · day 0−304590Beforepay supplier · advancecollect · 45 to 90 days~95 days financed by the companyAftercollect · LC at dispatchpay supplier · 45 dayscycle inverted · supplier credit funds the gap
Indicative day counts from contract terms. No additional borrowing was required for the change; it was negotiated by procurement and business development against finance-set targets.
Our positionA debt raise is not a sanction letter. It is a sequence of them, and each is only as large as the last audited number and the conduct of the account under the previous limit.
VIMonth 12 onward

Extend the structure

A CFO who has not met the customer is a controller with a broader title. Trade events were attended. Customers, suppliers and competitors were met directly. The product was understood at the level of what it does inside a plant, not at the level of a revenue line.

That understanding was applied across the leadership team. With the CTO, the R&D roadmap was converted into a capital and operating budget, with the intangible capitalisation policy agreed with the auditor in advance rather than contested at year end. With HR, the manpower plan was tied to the AOP and the training budget to the product roadmap. With operations, project expense and resource allocation were brought under tracking so that margin is known before a project closes. A risk register was built covering warranty and guarantee exposure under customer contracts, cyber risk for software deployed in critical infrastructure, employee travel and welfare, fixed assets and inventory, with each risk insured or consciously retained on the founder's sign-off.

International expansion is under way, with subsidiaries in the Middle East and the United States. Each entity is being established with its record complete before its first invoice: ODI filings under the Foreign Exchange Management (Overseas Investment) Rules, 2022; board resolutions; overseas incorporation; corporate bank onboarding at tier-one institutions using the ODI documentation as the KYC foundation; host-jurisdiction employment compliance; and a transfer pricing policy settled before the first intercompany transaction. A tax residency certificate for the Indian parent supports treaty positions.

Figure I · Structure ahead of the first overseas invoice
Indian parentDPIIT · 80-IAC · TRC obtainedODI · FEM (OI) Rules 2022ODI · FEM (OI) Rules 2022Middle East subsidiaryhost employment complianceUnited States subsidiaryhost employment complianceTP policy before first transactiontier-one bank · ODI file as KYCtier-one bank · ODI file as KYC

Series B preparationhas begun. The model was stress-tested from the investor's side of the table before any investor saw it: base-year integrity, R&D capitalisation, working capital assumptions and tax treatment were each challenged and corrected. Conversations are open with more than fifteen institutional venture funds at various stages.

Our positionAn overseas subsidiary incorporated in a week is the subsidiary a diligence team spends a month on. Incorporate it in a month.

Sixteen months, in order.

The right-hand column is the phase. Every entry in the lower half depended on an entry in the upper half being complete. The highlighted row is the one the case is named for.

  1. Month 0I

    Mandate begins. Daily cash statement instituted. Statutory obligations ranked first in the payment order.

  2. 0 to 3I · II

    Suppliers classified and re-sequenced. Payroll on a published schedule. Review of the declined strategic offer.

  3. 2 to 5II

    Model rebuilt from order book and PO history. Data room assembled. Sector family offices approached.

  4. 5 to 6III

    Term sheet. SHA executed. Shares dematerialised.

  5. Month 6III

    Bank notice of freeze for GST arrear, six hours to close of business, with allotment pending. Arrear cleared same day. Convertible note bridge drawn within the week under the DPIIT exception.

  6. 6 to 7III

    CCPS allotted. SSHA and SHA settled. Registered valuer's report. PAS-3, FC-GPR, CS certification.

  7. 7 to 9IV

    AOP and budgets. Finance team KPIs. Tally to Zoho. Monthly investor reporting begins.

  8. 8 to 12V

    Three successive limit enhancements under CGTMSE. Non-fund limit sanctioned.

  9. 9 to 12IV · VI

    TDS and GST reconciled to nil difference. Unqualified audit. Section 80-IAC recognition. Risk register and insurance programme.

  10. 10 to 16V

    Supplier and customer terms renegotiated. Second banker onboarded. Fund-based facility reaches mid-teens crores.

  11. 12 +VI

    Overseas subsidiaries, ODI, transfer pricing. Series B model. Fifteen-plus institutional conversations.

Where the outcome was not assured.

A case study that reads as a straight line from tight cash to a Series B pipeline is incomplete. These are the decisions that carried real downside, recorded with the downside.

  • Re-sequencing suppliers is credit taken without a sanction letter.

    It holds once, with suppliers who have been told the truth and paid on the revised date. Repeated, or done without notice, it costs supply, terms and standing in a market where every supplier knows every competitor. The later move from advance payment to 45-day credit was earned by the earlier commitments being met.

  • Declining the strategic offer was a decision with other people's salaries on the other side of it.

    Had the family office round not closed, the company would have exhausted its cash with no alternative in hand. The founder took that decision with the downside set out in writing. The CFO's contribution was the page, not the decision.

    Figure J · Three scenarios at month 6, same cheque size
    Accept strategic offer · 1×~6d% equity soldfunded · strategic on cap tableSeries B anchored lowDecline · round does not closeno roundcash exhausted in the quarterdownside set out in writingDecline · round closes · ~6×~d% equity soldfunded · operators on cap tableSeries B at ~30× in discussionEach grid is 100% of equity; filled dots are equity sold for the same cheque.The ratio is fixed by valuation; the absolute figure is not disclosed.The middle column was live until the SHA was executed.
  • The convertible note exception is narrow and should not be read as a template.

    It fails if DPIIT recognition has lapsed, if any single ticket is below ₹25 lakh, if the amount is received in tranches, or if the note is neither converted nor repaid within ten years. Each condition was verified before funds moved. A company that does not meet them has a deposit, not a bridge.

  • CGTMSE cover is a ceiling that moves with turnover.

    The facilities were built under the guarantee. Once turnover crosses the eligibility threshold, the lender reprices the entire book against the promoter's personal balance sheet. The two-bank architecture exists for that transition, and it added cost and complexity now to avoid a discontinuity later.

  • A Series B valuation in conversation is not a Series B valuation in the bank.

    Fifteen open conversations are a pipeline, not a result. The figure quoted in this case is where the discussions currently sit. If the round prices below it, this page will be revised.

Our positionEach of these decisions was taken by the founder with a one-page note in front of him setting out what could go wrong. That page is the product of the engagement. The outcome is its by-product.

Each row was a live file with a date on it.

WorkCondition addressedApplies to
Daily cash controlStatutory, payroll and supplier obligations drawing on the same balance, unrankedAny company whose R&D or capex runs ahead of collections
Supplier and payroll re-sequencingDeferrals occurring without notice or scheduleAny company under cash pressure that has not yet formalised it
Fundraise repositioningValuation anchored to a strategic buyer's replication costAny deep-technology company being priced by a strategic rather than an operator
Convertible note bridgeFunding required inside weeks; priced round requires monthsAny DPIIT-recognised startup with an executed SHA and pending allotment
CCPS round closingOffshore-template terms; FEMA record assembled after the factEvery priced round with foreign or family office participation
Debt ladder under CGTMSELimits below single-invoice size; uncapped promoter exposureAny MSME growing faster than its bank's comfort
Working capital, both endsAdvance payment to suppliers; ninety-day collection from customersAny project business with large customers and small suppliers
Compliance remediationMulti-year GST, TDS and MCA gaps ahead of diligenceAny company facing diligence within twelve months
Section 80-IACEligibility unusedAny DPIIT-recognised startup approaching profitability
Tally to ZohoNo project-level margin; multiple sources of recordAny project or multi-product company on a single-entity ledger
Overseas structuringSubsidiaries ahead of ODI, banking and transfer pricingAny Indian company entering overseas markets
Series B readinessModel built for the founder rather than for the investorAny company within eighteen months of its next round

If one of these rows describes the file on your desk, that row is the engagement.

Describe the file

Seven artefacts. All the company's.

The engagement produces one set of working documents. They are built inside the company, in its systems, and they remain when the seat is handed over.

  1. 01A daily cash statement the founder reads in two minutes.
  2. 02A monthly MIS by the tenth, reconciled to the books, with project-level margin.
  3. 03An AOP and budget that each function head has signed.
  4. 04A data room that is current on the day an investor asks for it.
  5. 05A compliance calendar with no overdue item on it.
  6. 06A debt file prepared for the next enhancement before the bank raises it.
  7. 07A finance team that produces all of the above without the CFO in the room.

What an Embedded CFO engagement covers.

Cash and stabilisation

Daily control, statutory prioritisation, supplier and payroll re-sequencing, and the counterparty conversations the founder should not be conducting alone.

Capital

Positioning, model, data room, instrument selection, term sheet negotiation and closing under Indian law. Convertible notes, CCPS, SHA and SSHA, FEMA filings.

Debt

CMA data, CGTMSE, limit enhancement sequencing, banker selection and multi-bank architecture, non-fund lines, LC and BG structures.

Function

AOP, budget, MIS, team design and KPIs, accounting system migration, process design.

Compliance

GST, TDS, MCA, audit readiness, Section 80-IAC, dematerialisation, board and secretarial hygiene.

Structure and next round

Overseas subsidiaries, ODI, transfer pricing, tax residency, intercompany agreements. Series B modelling and investor-side stress testing.

Partner embedded three to five days a week for a defined term, followed by handover to the permanent CFO the company can by then afford to recruit.

Stated plainly.

This is not a retainer that reviews what the accounts team has produced. It is not a fundraise mandate carrying a success fee; the CFO negotiating the round should hold no interest in its closing at any particular price. It is not a part-time arrangement in the stabilisation phase; the first ninety days are full-time or they are not effective. And it ends. The purpose of the engagement is a finance function that operates without us.

Do less. Do it right. Then write it down so it runs again.

If the cash position and the product are telling different stories, this is the engagement.

Send the last three months of bank statements and the current statutory position. Within five working days you receive a one-page note: actual weeks of runway, which obligations are time-critical, and whether an embedded seat is the right structure. If it is not, we say so on the first call.

Every submission reviewed by a practitioner. Not an intake team.

Or read the CFO Office case →

Anonymised and published with the client's consent. Figures are multiples and counts. The method is not anonymised.

Response within 2 working days · Every brief reviewed by a practitioner

© 2026 Divinitus Advisors LLP. All rights reserved.

This publication (www.dissent.one) is made available by Divinitus Advisors LLP for informational purposes only and is intended, but not promised or guaranteed, to be correct, complete, and up-to-date. Divinitus Advisors LLP does not warrant that the information contained on this knowledge site is accurate or complete, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or any other cause. This knowledge site is not intended to be a source of advertising or solicitation and the contents of the knowledge site should not be construed as legal advice. Furthermore, the owner of this knowledge site does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based solely upon viewing this knowledge site or in a country/state where this knowledge site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state. All rights reserved.